Is Prince Charles Endorsing Quackery? His Herbal Detox Products Stir Controversy

Faith-Based Health and Healing – Part 6 – Why God’s Response to Prayer Isn’t Always to Heal
March 13, 2009
Ironically, the most devout are the most likely to utilize death-to-the-end treatment
March 18, 2009
Show all

Is Prince Charles Endorsing Quackery? His Herbal Detox Products Stir Controversy

In an unusual turn of events, a prominent scientist in the United Kingdom is accusing Prince Charles of contributing to the “ill health of the nation” by backing with his name an herbal detox product that sells for about $13.75 per bottle and that he says is “outright quackery.”
More Information:
ABC News is reporting, “The crown prince is certainly not the first celebrity name to be associated with the worldwide detoxification trend.” 
Still, the concerns expressed by Edzard Ernst, Britain’s top complementary and alternative medicine expert and director of complementary medicine at the Peninsula Medical School, about the royal’s involvement with the Duchy Originals product line reached beyond the country’s shores this week.
The product in question is “Duchy Herbals Detox Tincture,” which contains dandelion and artichoke extracts. The Duchy Originals Web site suggests that those using the formulation take a few drops of it with water twice a day to “help eliminate toxins and aid digestion.”
According to BBC News, “Edzard Ernst, the UK’s first professor of complementary medicine, said the Duchy Originals detox tincture was based on “outright quackery”. 
“Under the banner of holistic and integrative health care, he promotes a ‘quick fix’ and outright quackery,” Ernst told Britain’s The Daily Mail newspaper Tuesday. “Prince Charles and his advisers seem to deliberately ignore science and prefer to rely on make-believe and superstition.”
There was no scientific evidence to show that detox products work, he said.
Duchy Originals says the product is a “natural aid to digestion and supports the body’s elimination processes”.
But Professor Ernst of Peninsula Medical School said Prince Charles and his advisers appeared to be deliberately ignoring science, preferring “to rely on ‘make-believe’ and superstition”.
He added: “Prince Charles thus financially exploits a gullible public in a time of financial hardship.”
Meanwhile, ABC News writes, “Duchy Originals refused to comment on Ernst’s comments beyond a statement issued by CEO Andrew Baker shortly after his comments became public.”
“There is no ‘quackery,’ no ‘make-believe’ and no ‘superstition’ in any of the Duchy Originals herbal tinctures,” the statement reads. “We find it unfortunate that Professor Ernst should chase sensationalist headlines in this way rather than concentrating on accuracy and objectivity.”
Baker further noted that the solution is marketed as a food supplement in accordance with all national and local laws and “has never been described as a medicine, remedy or cure for any disease.”
But, according to the BBC, “Professor Ernst said the suggestion that such products remove toxins from the body was ‘implausible, unproven and dangerous.’”
Mark Blumenthal, founder and executive director of the Austin, Texas-based herbal medicine think-tank American Botanical Council, said, “Many people – rationally or irrationally, correctly or not – believe strongly that they must detoxify their bodies to give themselves that extra edge to get rid of [these chemicals],” he said. “There is probably a healthy and rational basis for some of this, though some people take it a bit too far.”
And Dr. Roberta Lee, vice chair of the Department of Integrative Medicine at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City, said detoxification as a concept may be getting an undeservedly bad rap.
“Detoxification is a natural process that occurs in the body, though it is not labeled as such in the medical profession,” she said. “The idea that detox is a silly notion, I think, is a fallacy.”
To counter, Professor Ernst reponds, “Nothing would, of course, be easier than to demonstrate that detox products work. All one needed to do is to take a few blood samples from volunteers and test whether this or that toxin is eliminated from the body faster than normal.”
He went on to point out, “But where are the studies that demonstrate efficacy? They do not exist, and the reason is simple: these products have no real detoxification effects.”
Earlier this year, in England, the charitable trust Sense About Science produced a report that debunked the claims usually made about detox products.
Its researchers reviewed a series of products, from bottled water to face scrub, and found the detox assertions to be overwhelmingly meaningless.
“It seems outrageous for companies to be making money selling meaningless products but for the heir to the throne to be doing so, at £10 a pop, is even more inappropriate,” said Tom Wells, who helped carry out the original research.
“We’d like to see an end to detox products on the British high street, starting with Prince Charles’ detox tincture.”
The Truth Behind Detox

One thing that is clear about detox, however, is that it is a lucrative concept. 
According to ABC News: In an herbal and nutritional supplement industry that reaps an estimated $23 billion in sales in the United States each year, “detox” is the new hot-button term. Celebrities openly adhere to and advocate a variety of detox diets, while treatments that purport to cleanse blood, liver and bowels line the shelves of supplement stores throughout the country.
ABC News reports that many medical scientists in the U.K. are using the comments to launch an all-out attack on detox. 
Tom Wells of the Voice of Young Science network, which includes more than 300 early-career medical researchers, issued a statement on the group’s Web site that further chastised the prominent royal’s involvement in the product line.
“It seems outrageous for companies to be making money selling meaningless products, but for the heir to the throne to be doing so, at 10 pounds a pop, is even more inappropriate,” 
Wells’ statement reads. “We’d like to see an end to detox products on the British high street, starting with Prince Charles’ detox tincture.”
If you’d like an evidence-based and trustworthy review about detoxification, homeopathy, or even colonics, take a look at my book, Alternative Medicine: The Christian Handbook, which is endorsed by the Christian Medical Association and has been featured on broadcasts from Focus on the Family and the Christian Communications Network. 


  1. Bob Olree says:

    Dear Dr Walt,
    I just started using a product called MAX GXL, a glutathione accelerator and after just 1.5 weeks it has stopped the pain in my knee which I had broken several years back, and at 67 I am finding much more energy. I was very sceptical but now after actually finding results and then hearing your short piece this morning about the Prince pushing quackery, I would like you to look into this product. Thanks so much.

  2. Dr. Walt says:

    I’m delighted you are better — but it may have nothing to do with this product. According to The Natural Database, each softgel contains linolenic acid 375 mg, gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) 229 mg, oleic acid 190 mg, palmitic acid 114 mg, stearic acid 41 mg, and palmitoleic acid 3 mg.
    Alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) has been found to be possibly effective for atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension.
    However, it is difficult to separate effects of alpha-linolenic acid from those of other dietary, lifestyle, or drug interventions (12917).
    Furthermore, increasing dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid by 1.2 grams per day appears to decrease the risk of fatal coronary heart disease, in people with existing heart disease, by at least 20%. But, it is NOT known if alpha-linolenic acid supplements have these same benefits.
    Gamma-Linolenic Acid (GLA) has been found possibly effective for diabetic neuropathy.
    However, I am aware of no significant evidence that ALA or GLA help arthritis. Therefore, although you say it has helped you, I cannot recommend it — especially when other natural products have been shown to be effective.
    For example, The Natural Database states that glucosamine sulfate and SAMe are likely effective for osteoarthritis — and MSM and chondroitin are rated as possibly effective. To me, it makes more sense to try these products first, remembering that they can take 6-12 weeks to be effective.
    Also, I do not recommend glucosamine hydrochloride (glucosamine HCL) products as they have been shown to not be effective for arthritis.
    Furthermore, when it comes to GLA, there are so cautions to observe:
    1) Gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) appears to have anticoagulant effects. Theoretically, taking GLA with other anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs might increase the risk of bruising and bleeding.
    2) Also, theoretically, products containing gamma linolenic acid (GLA) and vitamin E might increase the risk of seizures in people being treat concomitantly with phenothiazine drugs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.